EXTINCT ATLAS WIKIEXTINCT LIFE ARCHIVE
Araucaria mirabilis (Araucaria mirabilis) · scientific reconstructionView original image

This is an original generative reconstruction, not a photograph or scientific plate.

Araucaria mirabilis

Araucaria mirabilis

Tall conifers bore nearly spherical cones whose internal scales and ovules were silicified by volcanic landscapes.

Structured expansion · editorial review pending

Time range
About 160 million years ago
Final stage
Middle Jurassic
Geographic range
Southern Gondwanan forest · Patagonia, Argentina

What was Araucaria mirabilis?

This archive records Araucaria mirabilis under the scientific name Araucaria mirabilis, with an age of About 160 million years ago and a range of Southern Gondwanan forest · Patagonia, Argentina. Tall conifers bore nearly spherical cones whose internal scales and ovules were silicified by volcanic landscapes.

Araucaria mirabilis grew in Jurassic Patagonia with spirally scaled branches. Large cones packed many seed scales, each carrying one seed, and resembled the bunya section of living araucarians.

Araucaria mirabilis at a glance

Scientific name
Araucaria mirabilis
Age
About 160 million years ago
Last recorded stage
Middle Jurassic
Known range
Southern Gondwanan forest · Patagonia, Argentina
Broad group
plant
Archive era
Mesozoic
Habitat signals
Forest
Documented regions
South America

How was Araucaria mirabilis built?

Overall body plan

Tall conifers bore nearly spherical cones whose internal scales and ovules were silicified by volcanic landscapes.

Growth architecture

The available record is interpreted through preserved proportions, attachment surfaces, wear and comparison with related organisms. For Araucaria mirabilis, those observations must be separated from features added only for visual reconstruction.

Reproductive structures

Araucaria mirabilis grew in Jurassic Patagonia with spirally scaled branches. Large cones packed many seed scales, each carrying one seed, and resembled the bunya section of living araucarians.

Growth and individual variation

A single specimen does not define the whole species. Size, maturity, preservation and possible sex differences are considered before anatomical traits are treated as typical of Araucaria mirabilis.

EukaryotaArchaeplastidaPlantaeAraucaria mirabilis

How did Araucaria mirabilis live?

Araucaria mirabilis grew in Jurassic Patagonia with spirally scaled branches. Large cones packed many seed scales, each carrying one seed, and resembled the bunya section of living araucarians. This ecological reconstruction is strongest where anatomy, associated organisms and the depositional setting point in the same direction.

What shaped its ecological limits?

Its populations depended on plant communities, soils, water availability and climate. Changes in any one factor did not necessarily cause immediate extinction, but interacting pressures could reduce range, recruitment and resilience.

Where and when did Araucaria mirabilis live?

This archive currently lists About 160 million years ago; Southern Gondwanan forest · Patagonia, Argentina. Fossil or historical occurrence data describe where evidence has been found, not every place the taxon once occupied. Species-level age and range limits still require source-specific review.

01

Documented geographic range

Southern Gondwanan forest · Patagonia, Argentina. This boundary can change when specimens are reidentified or new localities are published.

02

Time window

About 160 million years ago, with the final recorded stage listed as Middle Jurassic. Rock units and dating uncertainty mean the true biological range may extend beyond the known record.

03

Environmental setting

The archive uses the broad habitat labels Forest. These labels help explore related records; a habitat reconstruction requires evidence from individual localities.

What evidence supports reconstructions of Araucaria mirabilis?

01

Primary record

Cerro Cuadrado's petrified branches and hundreds of cones preserve scales, ovules and occasional embryos in three dimensions.

02

Comparative anatomy

Preserved structures are compared with close and functionally similar organisms. The method can constrain posture and function, but analogy alone cannot prove colour, behaviour or soft tissue.

03

Age and locality

Stratigraphy and occurrence records place Araucaria mirabilis within About 160 million years ago and Southern Gondwanan forest · Patagonia, Argentina. Reworked fossils and uncertain provenance are treated cautiously.

04

Open entity records

Links below connect the archive to available taxonomic and occurrence records. A matching name does not verify every ecological claim, and related-taxon links provide comparison rather than an exact species match.

Why did Araucaria mirabilis disappear?

Volcanism, climate shifts and conifer-community turnover in the later Jurassic ended this species.

The last fossil or observation marks the youngest evidence currently known, not necessarily the death of the final individual. Explanations are strongest when timing, environmental change and population biology agree; otherwise the profile preserves uncertainty instead of assigning a single dramatic cause.

Araucaria mirabilis FAQ

What was Araucaria mirabilis?

This archive records Araucaria mirabilis under the scientific name Araucaria mirabilis, with an age of About 160 million years ago. Tall conifers bore nearly spherical cones whose internal scales and ovules were silicified by volcanic landscapes.

When did Araucaria mirabilis live?

The current archive range is About 160 million years ago; its youngest recorded stage is Middle Jurassic.

Where was Araucaria mirabilis found?

The archive currently lists Southern Gondwanan forest · Patagonia, Argentina. Species-level locality assignments and the full geographic range still require source-specific review.

How do scientists know about Araucaria mirabilis?

Cerro Cuadrado's petrified branches and hundreds of cones preserve scales, ovules and occasional embryos in three dimensions.

Check the source record

Use the scientific name to compare taxonomy, occurrence records and the fossil record. Database coverage and classifications may differ.

How has this record changed?

  1. Completed an AI-assisted bilingual audit of the archive record, corrected identified issues and clarified evidence limits; independent editorial review is pending.
  2. Expanded into a structured bilingual profile with anatomy, ecology, range, evidence, debate and FAQs; independent editorial review is pending.
  3. Verified authoritative entity sources and added three responsive reconstruction sizes.
  4. Initial bilingual species record published.

Found an error or a better source?

Submit a correction