EXTINCT ATLAS WIKIEXTINCT LIFE ARCHIVE
Sphenophyllum (Sphenophyllum emarginatum) · scientific reconstructionView original image

This is an original generative reconstruction, not a photograph or scientific plate.

Sphenophyllum

Sphenophyllum emarginatum

Six wedge-shaped leaves encircled each node of a slender stem that trailed across the ground or climbed larger trees.

Structured expansion · editorial review pending

Time range
About 315–299 million years ago
Final stage
End of the Carboniferous
Geographic range
Euramerican coal-forest understory

What was Sphenophyllum?

This archive records Sphenophyllum under the scientific name Sphenophyllum emarginatum, with an age of About 315–299 million years ago and a range of Euramerican coal-forest understory. Six wedge-shaped leaves encircled each node of a slender stem that trailed across the ground or climbed larger trees.

Sphenophyllum was related to horsetails but remained a small scrambling plant. Toothed or lobed leaves grew in whorls, and compact cones carried rings of sporangia.

Sphenophyllum at a glance

Scientific name
Sphenophyllum emarginatum
Age
About 315–299 million years ago
Last recorded stage
End of the Carboniferous
Known range
Euramerican coal-forest understory
Broad group
plant
Archive era
Paleozoic
Habitat signals
Forest
Documented regions
Euramerican coal-forest understory

How was Sphenophyllum built?

Overall body plan

Six wedge-shaped leaves encircled each node of a slender stem that trailed across the ground or climbed larger trees.

Growth architecture

The available record is interpreted through preserved proportions, attachment surfaces, wear and comparison with related organisms. For Sphenophyllum, those observations must be separated from features added only for visual reconstruction.

Reproductive structures

Sphenophyllum was related to horsetails but remained a small scrambling plant. Toothed or lobed leaves grew in whorls, and compact cones carried rings of sporangia.

Growth and individual variation

A single specimen does not define the whole species. Size, maturity, preservation and possible sex differences are considered before anatomical traits are treated as typical of Sphenophyllum.

EukaryotaArchaeplastidaPlantaeSphenophyllum emarginatum

How did Sphenophyllum live?

Sphenophyllum was related to horsetails but remained a small scrambling plant. Toothed or lobed leaves grew in whorls, and compact cones carried rings of sporangia. This ecological reconstruction is strongest where anatomy, associated organisms and the depositional setting point in the same direction.

What shaped its ecological limits?

Its populations depended on plant communities, soils, water availability and climate. Changes in any one factor did not necessarily cause immediate extinction, but interacting pressures could reduce range, recruitment and resilience.

Where and when did Sphenophyllum live?

This archive currently lists About 315–299 million years ago; Euramerican coal-forest understory. Fossil or historical occurrence data describe where evidence has been found, not every place the taxon once occupied. Species-level age and range limits still require source-specific review.

01

Documented geographic range

Euramerican coal-forest understory. This boundary can change when specimens are reidentified or new localities are published.

02

Time window

About 315–299 million years ago, with the final recorded stage listed as End of the Carboniferous. Rock units and dating uncertainty mean the true biological range may extend beyond the known record.

03

Environmental setting

The archive uses the broad habitat labels Forest. These labels help explore related records; a habitat reconstruction requires evidence from individual localities.

What evidence supports reconstructions of Sphenophyllum?

01

Primary record

Complete compressions preserve nodes, leaf whorls and cones, documenting its abundance across the coal-forest floor.

02

Comparative anatomy

Preserved structures are compared with close and functionally similar organisms. The method can constrain posture and function, but analogy alone cannot prove colour, behaviour or soft tissue.

03

Age and locality

Stratigraphy and occurrence records place Sphenophyllum within About 315–299 million years ago and Euramerican coal-forest understory. Reworked fossils and uncertain provenance are treated cautiously.

04

Open entity records

Links below connect the archive to available taxonomic and occurrence records. A matching name does not verify every ecological claim, and related-taxon links provide comparison rather than an exact species match.

Why did Sphenophyllum disappear?

The collapse of coal forests removed humid understory habitat and many of the giant trees it used for support.

The last fossil or observation marks the youngest evidence currently known, not necessarily the death of the final individual. Explanations are strongest when timing, environmental change and population biology agree; otherwise the profile preserves uncertainty instead of assigning a single dramatic cause.

Sphenophyllum FAQ

What was Sphenophyllum?

This archive records Sphenophyllum under the scientific name Sphenophyllum emarginatum, with an age of About 315–299 million years ago. Six wedge-shaped leaves encircled each node of a slender stem that trailed across the ground or climbed larger trees.

When did Sphenophyllum live?

The current archive range is About 315–299 million years ago; its youngest recorded stage is End of the Carboniferous.

Where was Sphenophyllum found?

The archive currently lists Euramerican coal-forest understory. Species-level locality assignments and the full geographic range still require source-specific review.

How do scientists know about Sphenophyllum?

Complete compressions preserve nodes, leaf whorls and cones, documenting its abundance across the coal-forest floor.

Check the source record

Use the scientific name to compare taxonomy, occurrence records and the fossil record. Database coverage and classifications may differ.

How has this record changed?

  1. Completed an AI-assisted bilingual audit of the archive record, corrected identified issues and clarified evidence limits; independent editorial review is pending.
  2. Expanded into a structured bilingual profile with anatomy, ecology, range, evidence, debate and FAQs; independent editorial review is pending.
  3. Verified authoritative entity sources and added three responsive reconstruction sizes.
  4. Initial bilingual species record published.

Found an error or a better source?

Submit a correction